Some of its criticisms, such as John Searle's Chinese room, are themselves controversial.Download Turing test, Imitation game This issue of the Kybernetes. Since Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticised, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that "machines can think". Turing's new question is: "Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. It opens with the words: "I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? ' " Because "thinking" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to "replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words." Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the "imitation game", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. The test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper " Computing Machinery and Intelligence" while working at the University of Manchester.
Conferences Turing Colloquium 2005 Colloquium on Conversational Systems 2008 AISB Symposium The Alan Turing Year, and Turing100 in 2012.Variations Reverse Turing test and CAPTCHA Distinguishing accurate use of language from actual understanding Subject matter expert Turing test "Low-level" cognition test Total Turing test Electronic health records Minimum intelligent signal test Hutter Prize Other tests based on compression or Kolmogorov complexity Ebert test.the simulation of consciousness Naïveté of interrogators Silence Impracticality and irrelevance: the Turing test and AI research intelligence in general The Language-centric Objection Consciousness vs.
Strengths Tractability and simplicity Breadth of subject matter Emphasis on emotional and aesthetic intelligence.standard Turing test Should the interrogator know about the computer? Versions Imitation game Standard interpretation Imitation game vs.History Philosophical background Cultural background Alan Turing Intelligence as performative: queer and feminist interpretations ELIZA and PARRY The Chinese room Loebner Prize.
0 kommentar(er)
