I also found that in PhotoScore you had to go back and forth several times to the same menu items to do rather mundane tasks like adding dots to half notes. This reviewer felt that the keyboard shortcuts were much more intuitive than PhotoScore’s. In my initial tests, I found that SmartScore was much easier to use than PhotoScore. Who cares about the lyrics, I thought, I need this to recognize music not text anyway, right? However, I noticed that PhotoScore did a better job of recognizing lyrics than SmartScore. I found that SmartScore recognized the notes, articulations and dotted rhythms much more accurately than PhotoScore. While testing the demo versions I used the same cleanly scanned sheet of five line choral music from a book published in 1948. I decided to purchase SmartScore X Pro after I did some extensive testing on demo versions of it and Neuratron’s PhotoScore Ultimate, along with the less expensive limited editions of the SmartScore. I didn’t want to run into any copyright infringements for reproducing 500 year old music from relatively modern sources and thought that I should look into some music OCR programs to simplify the process of reformatting and arranging them.
I Primarily bought it to publish a few songs that I am referencing in a forthcoming article about wedding music from the time of the Renaissance. I’ve recently purchased a copy of Musitek’s SmartScrore X Pro.
SmartScore Pro X Box, rests on a MacBook Pro a Harmonious Match For a Musical World Photo: Eric Ortner
0 kommentar(er)
